Видео

Is it possible to use your presentation in the form of screenshots with mentioning your name?

no one qustions how the equation 7 and equation 8 dedrive the equation 9? in my view, equation 9 lacks a 1/2

Thank you sincerely for your lectures! Wish we had such teachers.

Great video! Thank you for making this series. I noticed an error in equation 14 (around the 15 minute mark). The face area (A_f) has been dropped from the last two terms.

You are just awesome Sir, I really love learning your lectures Sir, you are the BEST!!!

Nice video! If you included examples of what good looks like (desired aspect ratios for varying mesh problems) for the SS and references for that it might enhance the experience.

Does anyone know the previous video he is mentioning where he covered the y+ understanding? Thanks,

Being relatively new to CFD as a mid-career engineer, your videos have been INCREDIBLY helpful, and BEYOND valuable. Thank you!

Extremely helpful presentation, cleared all my doubts. Many thanks!

Nice video, thank you! I am using a porous medium to represent a spiral tube bank so the flow has a non negligible radial and circumferential velocity, how can I calculate c1 and c2 values for this?

really like the style of your lecture

Hey, how is roughness accounted for if we don't use wall functions? Let's say I want to model viscous sublayer with linear profile where wall functions are not used.

One amazing lecture! Thank you so much, Dr. Aidan!

Nice work

you are a blessing man, thank you very much.

amazing lecture!!! I just have one question: why does the k-omega formulation does not need wall functions? if we can convert between omega and epsilon freely, why this formulation does not use damping functions?

Hello sir, thank you for the video. For guessing the number of inflation layer and its geometric growth rate, can we just make a layer height column in spreadsheet, next its total height up to each column number, and next its error% relative to delta_99? Then, simply try different growth rate values and pick whichever combination of N and G gives the smallest positive error% (a negative error% means the inflation layer doesn't capture the boundary layer). My initial thought is that this eliminates the hassle of using root finding methods or using arithmetic and logarithmic manipulation.

hi ! thank you very much for this video, it is very well explained ! what do you think about a radial mapping with a growth rate instead ? if I'm right the issue with numerical diffusion is non transverse to the flow meshing, radial meshing with prisms would not be an issue.

Very clear explanation. Thank you so much!

Very nice ❤

Thank for your work. It's ver useful.

Great video, Here u used RANS averaged equation for Resolved part in LES. But from i understanding, we cannot use RANS average equations instead of filtering for the resolved part. Please correct if am wrong...

(The best explanation of material derrivative so far)^n

Hey Aiden, how about a video on Richardson Extrapolation for mesh convergence studies? Maybe using the ASME guidelines for best practice or something ...

I have a question about the skewness and neighboring corrections in ANSYS Fluent. As I understand it, non-orthogonal correctors run in the background, and the user actually has no role in adjusting them. However, what about skewness errors? These corrections are actually up to the user to define, and they have to be an integer number, 1or higher. So, how do these affect the equations, and why do they only appear in the PISO algorithm

Excellent video sir. I have a battery that is discharging. As it discharges, it generates heat which is dissipated into the cooling medium. While the heat generated in the battery is captured by meshing it and using an MSMD plug in that introduces a heat source term in the battery component related cell zones, can I still use the "External heat transfer coefficient to capture heat dissipation ?"

Nice video. Thanks!! 😃

excellent!

While I was studying in Germany, I attended CFD lectures delivered by some professors. However, I must admit that your explanations are better than theirs 😅 If I'm struggling with some CFD theory, I often turn to your channel's playlist for help.

Saved my day !!

Dr. Aiden would you please help me regarding solving my research paper?

Brilliant as usual

WO......W !!

Don't think anyone can do the explanation better than you. Thanks💞

Very informative and full of LES clues, many thanks

awesome tutorial!!! It's much more clear than what I read on text book

Please make some videos regarding modelling of membranes in CFD

It is impressive the quality of these videos! I wonder why are you not at NASA/ESA already!

Outstanding introduction to LES

Hi, very interesting theory about the model but I have a question. Where can I get values of properties material such as concrete or sidewalk for DO model ( scattering, absorption and refractive index)? Could you provide them if you have it please? Regards

Why does diagonal dominance reduce with a positive S contribution? By definition, for a diagonal dominance, the absolute value of the element on the diagonal is considered to be greater than the sum of the absolute values of the other elements in that row. Thank you for your pricesless time and teachings about this tremendous topic.

This is great explantion. Thank you very much Aidan!

I really, really like your approach of explaining things. Like when you go through concrete examples with numbers instead of variables or explain physical meaning also circling back to the basics when needed, it makes it possible to understand this even for people like myself, who has very little experience if CFD solvers. Thank you very much.

Amazing content!

which method does ANSYS Fluent use to go over the non orthogonality? and can users specify a certain approach ?

Hi Very interesting video but I have a question How can I running long transient simulation with solar ray tracing? Regards

Awesome explanation, thank you very much for your work!

prof. where i can get this PPT

This is incredible. I am shocked at how you managed to explain this hard topic in really simple terms. Thank you so much

Good explanation of the K-w model. Please provide an explanation of the different K-w models' respective applications. Thank you